<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workflow: OS X 10.5.2 Fixes Stacks!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/</link>
	<description>Free Design Resources including free vectors, buttons, icons, fading corners, quick tips, tutorials and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13934</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13934</guid>
		<description>@Bitt

I know, but I doesn't fix my download folder, since I want the latest downloaded item to be at the bottom of the stack, when you hit the icon. This can only be done in "fan view". List view on the other hand is really great for the application folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bitt</p>
<p>I know, but I doesn&#8217;t fix my download folder, since I want the latest downloaded item to be at the bottom of the stack, when you hit the icon. This can only be done in &#8220;fan view&#8221;. List view on the other hand is really great for the application folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BittBox</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>BittBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>@Esben, 

You can select "sort by: Name" to fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Esben, </p>
<p>You can select &#8220;sort by: Name&#8221; to fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WR</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13911</link>
		<dc:creator>WR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13911</guid>
		<description>i'm not sure i know what this "stacks" feature that supposedly got better is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure i know what this &#8220;stacks&#8221; feature that supposedly got better is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davey</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13906</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13906</guid>
		<description>I've been using my Dock on the side (same as your screenshots) for a while now as I find the space it takes up when auto hidden is less than when it's along the bottom.

Do you know what I mean? If you have the dock auto hide, and you set a window to fill the entire screen, there's still a tiny little lip between the edge of the window and the edge of the screen where the dock is. When it's on the bottom of the screen, it takes up more space because of the aspect ratio on a wide screen.

It always disappointed me that the wall Dock (if that's a fair name?) didn't have the same stack and display features as the one on the bottom. No fan stacks, and no 3D Dock. It's good that we finally have the list view, and I'm most pleased about being able to display the stacks as their folder icons now.

But I'm a little sad about the "Adjusts menus to be slightly-less translucent overall" change. I had absolutely no problems with menu translucency, and now it's pretty much opaque. Lost some of its pretty, in my opinion!

And that Opaque menu bar option came at a point after I think a lot of us already got used to the transparent one we were stuck with. Oh well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using my Dock on the side (same as your screenshots) for a while now as I find the space it takes up when auto hidden is less than when it&#8217;s along the bottom.</p>
<p>Do you know what I mean? If you have the dock auto hide, and you set a window to fill the entire screen, there&#8217;s still a tiny little lip between the edge of the window and the edge of the screen where the dock is. When it&#8217;s on the bottom of the screen, it takes up more space because of the aspect ratio on a wide screen.</p>
<p>It always disappointed me that the wall Dock (if that&#8217;s a fair name?) didn&#8217;t have the same stack and display features as the one on the bottom. No fan stacks, and no 3D Dock. It&#8217;s good that we finally have the list view, and I&#8217;m most pleased about being able to display the stacks as their folder icons now.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m a little sad about the &#8220;Adjusts menus to be slightly-less translucent overall&#8221; change. I had absolutely no problems with menu translucency, and now it&#8217;s pretty much opaque. Lost some of its pretty, in my opinion!</p>
<p>And that Opaque menu bar option came at a point after I think a lot of us already got used to the transparent one we were stuck with. Oh well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maize</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13904</link>
		<dc:creator>maize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13904</guid>
		<description>i didn't realley know that apple has released something, but today i played around with my dock und get satifisied :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t realley know that apple has released something, but today i played around with my dock und get satifisied :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13902</guid>
		<description>Panagiotis@ there are some ways to change the dock from a 3D look. I personally can't stand the 3D dock 

Take a look right here: http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html

Christofer: Yeah I agree... more options, but still I can't use it the list view, since it reverses the "latest download".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panagiotis@ there are some ways to change the dock from a 3D look. I personally can&#8217;t stand the 3D dock </p>
<p>Take a look right here: <a href="http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html" rel="nofollow">http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html</a></p>
<p>Christofer: Yeah I agree&#8230; more options, but still I can&#8217;t use it the list view, since it reverses the &#8220;latest download&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panagiotis Karageorgakis</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13901</link>
		<dc:creator>Panagiotis Karageorgakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13901</guid>
		<description>The original stacks implementation would have been nice if it was an additional feature, but Apple decided to discontinue the list view. Now it's back, at last.

Now I wish for the next update to support the old dock's look instead of the shiny-reflective-can't-tell-which-app-is-running thing. Or at least the old look in a polished new way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original stacks implementation would have been nice if it was an additional feature, but Apple decided to discontinue the list view. Now it&#8217;s back, at last.</p>
<p>Now I wish for the next update to support the old dock&#8217;s look instead of the shiny-reflective-can&#8217;t-tell-which-app-is-running thing. Or at least the old look in a polished new way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christofer</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13899</link>
		<dc:creator>Christofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13899</guid>
		<description>Finally! This was one of my biggest complains about Leopard.

Esben, I too find this a bit annoying. However, if you got so much content in the folder that you need to scroll, it would be a pain to have it at the bottom. The best would be to have an option for reversed sorting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally! This was one of my biggest complains about Leopard.</p>
<p>Esben, I too find this a bit annoying. However, if you got so much content in the folder that you need to scroll, it would be a pain to have it at the bottom. The best would be to have an option for reversed sorting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13897</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13897</guid>
		<description>The List view have a bug.. It don't sort correctly. If you choose list view, the latest downloaded file comes at the very top of the stack, instead in the bottom, like "fan view" - that means more mouse moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The List view have a bug.. It don&#8217;t sort correctly. If you choose list view, the latest downloaded file comes at the very top of the stack, instead in the bottom, like &#8220;fan view&#8221; - that means more mouse moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattT</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13895</link>
		<dc:creator>MattT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13895</guid>
		<description>@katrina: Yes, the update is free. The easiest way to get it is to go up to the Apple menu (blue apple in top left corner of screen) and choose "Software Update..." Then just follow the prompts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@katrina: Yes, the update is free. The easiest way to get it is to go up to the Apple menu (blue apple in top left corner of screen) and choose &#8220;Software Update&#8230;&#8221; Then just follow the prompts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katrina</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13894</link>
		<dc:creator>katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13894</guid>
		<description>this may sound like a silly question, but i am not on the up-and-up in the mac world :) even though i have a macbook. where do you go to get the update, and is it free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this may sound like a silly question, but i am not on the up-and-up in the mac world :) even though i have a macbook. where do you go to get the update, and is it free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>Update is downloading now...180mb.  Got to be something good!  Glad it is an actual update, not a patch like MS does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update is downloading now&#8230;180mb.  Got to be something good!  Glad it is an actual update, not a patch like MS does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator>Squawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13888</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Stacks have regularly pissed me of ever since they have been introduced. I am downloading the update now.

Thanks for letting us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Stacks have regularly pissed me of ever since they have been introduced. I am downloading the update now.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
