<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workflow: OS X 10.5.2 Fixes Stacks!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks</link>
	<description>Free Design Resources including free vectors, buttons, icons, fading corners, quick tips, tutorials and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:30:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13934</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13934</guid>
		<description>@Bitt

I know, but I doesn&#039;t fix my download folder, since I want the latest downloaded item to be at the bottom of the stack, when you hit the icon. This can only be done in &quot;fan view&quot;. List view on the other hand is really great for the application folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bitt</p>
<p>I know, but I doesn&#8217;t fix my download folder, since I want the latest downloaded item to be at the bottom of the stack, when you hit the icon. This can only be done in &#8220;fan view&#8221;. List view on the other hand is really great for the application folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BittBox</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>BittBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>@Esben, 

You can select &quot;sort by: Name&quot; to fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Esben, </p>
<p>You can select &#8220;sort by: Name&#8221; to fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WR</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13911</link>
		<dc:creator>WR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13911</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not sure i know what this &quot;stacks&quot; feature that supposedly got better is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure i know what this &#8220;stacks&#8221; feature that supposedly got better is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davey</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13906</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13906</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using my Dock on the side (same as your screenshots) for a while now as I find the space it takes up when auto hidden is less than when it&#039;s along the bottom.

Do you know what I mean? If you have the dock auto hide, and you set a window to fill the entire screen, there&#039;s still a tiny little lip between the edge of the window and the edge of the screen where the dock is. When it&#039;s on the bottom of the screen, it takes up more space because of the aspect ratio on a wide screen.

It always disappointed me that the wall Dock (if that&#039;s a fair name?) didn&#039;t have the same stack and display features as the one on the bottom. No fan stacks, and no 3D Dock. It&#039;s good that we finally have the list view, and I&#039;m most pleased about being able to display the stacks as their folder icons now.

But I&#039;m a little sad about the &quot;Adjusts menus to be slightly-less translucent overall&quot; change. I had absolutely no problems with menu translucency, and now it&#039;s pretty much opaque. Lost some of its pretty, in my opinion!

And that Opaque menu bar option came at a point after I think a lot of us already got used to the transparent one we were stuck with. Oh well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using my Dock on the side (same as your screenshots) for a while now as I find the space it takes up when auto hidden is less than when it&#8217;s along the bottom.</p>
<p>Do you know what I mean? If you have the dock auto hide, and you set a window to fill the entire screen, there&#8217;s still a tiny little lip between the edge of the window and the edge of the screen where the dock is. When it&#8217;s on the bottom of the screen, it takes up more space because of the aspect ratio on a wide screen.</p>
<p>It always disappointed me that the wall Dock (if that&#8217;s a fair name?) didn&#8217;t have the same stack and display features as the one on the bottom. No fan stacks, and no 3D Dock. It&#8217;s good that we finally have the list view, and I&#8217;m most pleased about being able to display the stacks as their folder icons now.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m a little sad about the &#8220;Adjusts menus to be slightly-less translucent overall&#8221; change. I had absolutely no problems with menu translucency, and now it&#8217;s pretty much opaque. Lost some of its pretty, in my opinion!</p>
<p>And that Opaque menu bar option came at a point after I think a lot of us already got used to the transparent one we were stuck with. Oh well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maize</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13904</link>
		<dc:creator>maize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13904</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t realley know that apple has released something, but today i played around with my dock und get satifisied :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t realley know that apple has released something, but today i played around with my dock und get satifisied :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13902</guid>
		<description>Panagiotis@ there are some ways to change the dock from a 3D look. I personally can&#039;t stand the 3D dock 

Take a look right here: http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html

Christofer: Yeah I agree... more options, but still I can&#039;t use it the list view, since it reverses the &quot;latest download&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panagiotis@ there are some ways to change the dock from a 3D look. I personally can&#8217;t stand the 3D dock </p>
<p>Take a look right here: <a href="http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html" rel="nofollow">http://macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/terminal-commands-for-hidden-settings-in-leopard.html</a></p>
<p>Christofer: Yeah I agree&#8230; more options, but still I can&#8217;t use it the list view, since it reverses the &#8220;latest download&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panagiotis Karageorgakis</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13901</link>
		<dc:creator>Panagiotis Karageorgakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13901</guid>
		<description>The original stacks implementation would have been nice if it was an additional feature, but Apple decided to discontinue the list view. Now it&#039;s back, at last.

Now I wish for the next update to support the old dock&#039;s look instead of the shiny-reflective-can&#039;t-tell-which-app-is-running thing. Or at least the old look in a polished new way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original stacks implementation would have been nice if it was an additional feature, but Apple decided to discontinue the list view. Now it&#8217;s back, at last.</p>
<p>Now I wish for the next update to support the old dock&#8217;s look instead of the shiny-reflective-can&#8217;t-tell-which-app-is-running thing. Or at least the old look in a polished new way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christofer</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13899</link>
		<dc:creator>Christofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13899</guid>
		<description>Finally! This was one of my biggest complains about Leopard.

Esben, I too find this a bit annoying. However, if you got so much content in the folder that you need to scroll, it would be a pain to have it at the bottom. The best would be to have an option for reversed sorting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally! This was one of my biggest complains about Leopard.</p>
<p>Esben, I too find this a bit annoying. However, if you got so much content in the folder that you need to scroll, it would be a pain to have it at the bottom. The best would be to have an option for reversed sorting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13897</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13897</guid>
		<description>The List view have a bug.. It don&#039;t sort correctly. If you choose list view, the latest downloaded file comes at the very top of the stack, instead in the bottom, like &quot;fan view&quot; - that means more mouse moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The List view have a bug.. It don&#8217;t sort correctly. If you choose list view, the latest downloaded file comes at the very top of the stack, instead in the bottom, like &#8220;fan view&#8221; &#8211; that means more mouse moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattT</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13895</link>
		<dc:creator>MattT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13895</guid>
		<description>@katrina: Yes, the update is free. The easiest way to get it is to go up to the Apple menu (blue apple in top left corner of screen) and choose &quot;Software Update...&quot; Then just follow the prompts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@katrina: Yes, the update is free. The easiest way to get it is to go up to the Apple menu (blue apple in top left corner of screen) and choose &#8220;Software Update&#8230;&#8221; Then just follow the prompts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katrina</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13894</link>
		<dc:creator>katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13894</guid>
		<description>this may sound like a silly question, but i am not on the up-and-up in the mac world :) even though i have a macbook. where do you go to get the update, and is it free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this may sound like a silly question, but i am not on the up-and-up in the mac world :) even though i have a macbook. where do you go to get the update, and is it free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>Update is downloading now...180mb.  Got to be something good!  Glad it is an actual update, not a patch like MS does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update is downloading now&#8230;180mb.  Got to be something good!  Glad it is an actual update, not a patch like MS does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/comment-page-1#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator>Squawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bittbox.com/os-x/workflow-os-x-1052-fixes-stacks/#comment-13888</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Stacks have regularly pissed me of ever since they have been introduced. I am downloading the update now.

Thanks for letting us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Stacks have regularly pissed me of ever since they have been introduced. I am downloading the update now.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
